Martin Logan Scenario Floorstanding Speakers
Martin Logan Scenario Floorstanding Speakers
USER REVIEWS
[Nov 11, 2007]
Ironskull
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
The scenario is only 48 inches tall but they play like the big boys
Weakness:
Nary one that I can find
Similar Products Used: Kef, Bohlender-Graebener, Polk, B&W |
[Oct 24, 2007]
abidmrcog
AudioPhile
Strength:
Amazing performance to its specialized fields. Must listen to it if you can afford, other wise you will not like the other stuff you have at you doors.
Weakness:
not ment for rock, tecno,heavy metals and distortion emitters as the sound will come out to be numbed for the listeners, you must go for klipsch in that sence. These Speakers Pair has opened my ears to enter into the jazz world, Specialized for classical and instrumental, even a slight pin drop and glass break is felt. Guitar and tympanic plus the vocal performance appears to be realistic, as if they are playing in front of you. Due to its hybrid performance they are doing their best of both the worlds. Amazing performance to its specialize fields. Similar Products Used: B&W 803, 604, new model 683 |
[Sep 23, 2007]
abid
AudioPhile
Strength:
Excellent for classicals, vocal, jazz, drum,stereo and home theater .
Weakness:
Only specialise in classicals
Paid a lot more due to lack of availability in my country, purchased it for a private party who was selling it .
Similar Products Used: Martinlogan Prodogy, B&W N803S |
[Oct 02, 2003]
slbenz
AudioPhile
Strength:
Open and detailed sound. Soundstage is very wide. Jazz and classical music sounds incredibly live. Best speaker design for voice.
Weakness:
Reveals weaknesses in your stereo system. Bass response needs a good subwoofer to support it. Bought these as a replacement for a pair of B&W CDM7SEs. I thought the B&Ws were good, the Scenarios are great! Much greater resolution, depth and detail. I guess it is part of the electrostatic design. Auditioned these with the new Mosaics and Claritys by Martin Logan. The Mosaics though good still did not have the open and airy sound of the Scenarios. The Scenarios sounded very similar to the Claritys in detail and open soundstage. The Scenarios definitely have a small sweet spot. It is almost eerie to sit down and hear the singer literally sound like they are in front of you. Standing up reduces the high frequencies somewhat. If you are looking for highly detailed and open speakers, you should give this a demo. And at the price I paid, I feel they are a steal. Similar Products Used: B&W CDM7SE, Klipsch Heresy II, Klipsch KG2, Cambridge Soundworks Ensemble II. |
[Feb 14, 2003]
David Carrington
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Imaging, realism, build quality, looks and value for money.
Weakness:
At around US$2,000 it would be criminal to find fault with these. The ML Scenario offers a compact taste of the qualities of ESL technologies. Extremely spacious and natural presentation, with none of the usual unnatural spittiness of box speakers with dome tweeters. The fact that the ESL panel handles all frequencies from 500Hz up enables an almost seamless presentation that retains much of the dynamic contrasts that are filtered out through a conventional dynamic speaker and its x-over. Bass is surprisingly well extended, and tight and punchy. The ressst of the frequency range can only be described as MAGIC! Very few products let you just sit back, smile and enjoy listening to music, without picking faults in your system. But this is one of them. Mind you, don't think you can compromise on the quality af all that preceeds them, because they are very revealing. Similar Products Used: Acoustat |
[Jan 26, 2003]
Shane
AudioPhile
Strength:
Realistic scale, soundstage, detail recovery and stunning appearance.
Weakness:
None really, but could be revealing of poor quality sources. This is a remarkable product. It's ability to create a sense of spaciousness and natural perspective to recreated sound is quite amazing at the asking price. |
[Jan 04, 2003]
Brian
AudioPhile
Strength:
Very revealing midrange and surprisingly good bass extension to its rated 45Hz (sounded even deeper in my room). Excellent imaging and soundstaging from the sweet spot.
Weakness:
Bright tonal shading (may be less obvious with a good tubed amp, but I would stay away from low end solid state.) Lean in upper bass to lower midrange transition. Expensive at full list (about $3500 Cdn)given the relatively small listening window. This review is to replace an earlier one that I wrote, but asked to be withdrawn because a significant portion was accidentally deleted during posting. I picked these up to use in a second system mainly because I have always wanted to own electrostatics. The system is modest and consists of an Antique Sound lab AQ-1003DT integrated tube amp and Denon DCD-425 cd player with Kimper PBJ interconnects and Linn LK-2 speaker cable. The room is large (50'x12'x8') but I listen in a 20'x 12' section with the speakers placed 2' in front of the long wall. I found the sweet spot to be very small but was able to minimize this by elevating the speakers on paving stones (2 each at the front and back), spiking them with inexpensive spikes purchased from a local stero store and tilting them back. I also found that playing with the toe-in is critical and ended up angling them so that I was on axis with the inner 1/3rd of the electrostatic driver. In a nutshell my impressions were (using well recorded jazz, R&B, pop and classical music): 1. Very clear and open midrange, but a little reticient in the upper bass to lower midrange transition. 2. Smooth highs that were not harsh but a little bright and lacking a little refinement on top. 3. Extended bass (this surprised me based on some of the previous reviews)to the point where a sub-woofer was not mandatory. However, I did try the system connected to my sunfire true subwoofer and gained some extension and warmth with the subwoofer crossover set to about 30Hz and the level set quite low. 4. Very good soundstage width and depth when postioned appropriately, but image height was low (due to the size of the electrostatic element)and a lot of the magic was lost when I stood up. Compared to my upstairs setup the system lacked a little warmth and refinement at the extremes and was less dynamic. Overall though, I was quite impressed at the quality of sound that I got from this modest, untweaked system. Please note that the value rating is based on the full list price. Similar Products Used: B&W CDM1SE & 805s, Totem Mite & Model-1s, Gershman (various), Living Voice, Verity Audio (various), Magnepan 1.6QRs. |
[Oct 01, 2001]
scott
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Transparent
Weakness:
Little bass below 70 hz I use them for surrounds in all Martin Logan system and they are great. Very tranparent and natural sounding. I used them as front spkrs and they are quite good there too. Subwoofer is mandatory for good bass below 70 hz but make sure the sub is up to the quality of the Scenario. Should be used in small to medium room if you want to play them loud. Fine spkr and MUCH better than most box spkrs at twice the price. Similar Products Used: Dunlavy, Def Tech |
[Nov 06, 2000]
Vivi vi
Audiophile
Strength:
smooth highs
Weakness:
NO dynamics on orchestral music, little to no bass, extremely directive, rubber-like timbres, Listening to these speakers was a big deception for me ! Similar Products Used: B&W Nautilus 805, Avant-scene Elektra, LEEDH Psyche 2, Thiel 0.5, M.Logan Aerius i |
[Aug 18, 1999]
Bob Y
an Audio Enthusiast
I spent hours comparing this speaker to several others in this price range, and the inescapable conclusion that I have for this speaker (and most other "electrostatic/ribbon/planar" speakers) is that it is rich in detail and resolution-though not warmth or smoothness-so long as that information occurs in the upper octaves. They are bright, sometimes verging on being edgy and sharp, for daily listening. It is easy to be seduced by the clarity-many apparently are. The sound is notable, though it is not natural. The attached low freq. driver on the Scenario makes no difference, really. The damage is done-musically-by the panel. |